THE TOP 1% - Social Vibes

Home
Books
About
Publications
Honors
Bio
Search for:

← CROWDED PRISONS
APARTMENT THERAPY →
TOP 1%
Posted on May 20, 2012 by joelsnell99
The very rich in America increasingly work in finance, marry each other and care passionately about politics
Jan 21st 2012 | from the print edition
MITT ROMNEY is not the first multi-millionaire to seek the presidency, nor the richest. Ross Perot, the record-holder, spent some of his billions earned from computer data on losing bids in 1992 and 1996. Since then men who owe their or their family’s fortunes to oil, sport, publishing, trial law, ketchup, beer and bestselling autobiographies have followed.
But Mr Romney, who earned his $200m or so as a private-equity executive buying and selling companies, is the first candidate from the world of high-octane finance. As such, he illustrates the changing complexion of America’s rich. The wealthiest 1% of Americans not only get more of the pie (see chart); they are increasingly creatures of finance.
In this section
»Who exactly are the 1%?
Soak or swim
Stopping SOPA
Not so fast
You’re on film
Studying on a shoestring
The pardoner’s tale
The Palmetto primary
Reprints
Related topics
Business
Economics
Economic Inequality
Occupy Wall Street
United States
The average household income of the 1% was $1.2m in 2008, according to federal tax data. The ultra-rich skew that average upwards: admission to the 1% began at $380,000 in 2008. The Congressional Budget Office puts the cut-off lower, at $347,000 in 2007, or $252,000 after subtracting federal taxes and adding back transfers. Measured by net worth, rather than income, the top 1% started at $6.9m in 2009, according to the Federal Reserve, down 23% from 2007.
The richest 1% earn roughly half their income from wages and salaries, a quarter from self-employment and business income, and the remainder from interest, dividends, capital gains and rent. According to an analysis of tax returns by Jon Bakija of Williams College and two others, 16% of the top 1% were in medical professions and 8% were lawyers: shares that have changed little between 1979 and 2005, the latest year the authors examined (see chart). The most striking shift has been the growth of financial occupations, from just under 8% of the wealthy in 1979 to 13.9% in 2005. Their representation within the top 0.1% is even more pronounced: 18%, up from 11% in 1979.
Steve Kaplan of the University of Chicago thinks finance explains much of the rise in inequality. Updating a series developed by Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, Mr Kaplan notes that the share of income going to the 1% reached an 80-year high of 23.5% in 2007, only to sink to 17.6% in 2009 as the financial markets deflated (see chart). The trend is even more pronounced for the top 0.1%, whose share of total income rose to 12.3% in 2007 but sank to a still disproportionate 8.1% in 2009.
Mr Kaplan and Joshua Rauh of Northwestern University note that investment bankers, corporate lawyers, hedge-fund and private-equity managers have displaced corporate executives at the top of the income ladder. In 2009 the richest 25 hedge-fund investors earned more than $25 billion, roughly six times as much as all the chief executives of companies in the S&P 500 stock index combined.
Although the 1% have been gaining share in most countries, a recent OECD report shows that the trend began sooner, and has gone further, in America. Some scholars, noting that inequality has risen more in English-speaking countries, think social and political values may play a role: in mainland Europe and Japan, corporate governance, tax laws and unionisation have tended to lessen income disparities. But the relatively large role of the financial sector in English-speaking countries could also be a factor: even more of the top 1% work in finance in Britain than in America.
Membership in America’s 1% is relatively stable; three-quarters of the households in the percentile one year will still be there the next. Although the proportion shrinks over time, one study found that the vast majority of the top 1% were still in the richest 10% a decade later. Kinship plays a big part: rich parents tend to produce rich kids. High levels of educational attainment and stable families help in this. According to Gallup, 72% of the 1% have a college degree, and half have a postgraduate degree; those are two to three times the proportion of the other 99%. The 1% are more likely to be married and to have children.
The rich also increasingly marry people like themselves. Mr Bakija and his co-authors found that between 1979 and 2005, the share of spouses of the 1% who had blue-collar or “miscellaneous” service-sector backgrounds declined slightly, from 7.9% to 6.4%. The share of spouses who worked in finance, property and law rose from 3.5% to 8.8%.
Politically, Gallup polls find that the 1% are more likely than the 99% to identify themselves as Republicans (33% to 28%) and less likely to be Democrats (26% to 33%). A survey of 104 wealthy families in the Chicago area, led by Benjamin Page of Northwestern University, found the budget deficit was their leading worry, followed by unemployment; for the broader population, the reverse is true. Still the rich, like most voters, have eclectic views, often supporting liberal and conservative positions simultaneously. For example, Keith Whitaker, who advises wealthy families on behalf of Wells Fargo, says many of them sympathise with the Occupy Wall Street movement. A lot of them became rich by building businesses and consider Wall Street “the place where businesses are taken apart and run by someone else”.
Bob Perkowitz embodies these contradictions. A rich entrepreneur, he now devotes much of his time to a non-profit environmental outfit. He is a lifelong Republican who objects to George Bush junior’s tax cuts for the wealthy, and backed Barack Obama in 2008. Having restructured companies himself, he has no trouble with Mr Romney’s private-equity work but agrees with Occupy Wall Street that corporations have too much power.
Until recently he split his time between conservative Charlotte, North Carolina, and liberal Washington, DC. His wife, Lisa Renstrom, used to manage hotels inherited from her father, a prosperous Republican businessman. Now she campaigns on climate change and backs Wealth for the Common Good, a group of rich people who back Occupy Wall Street. Her father used to give his occupation as “capitalist”. “I grew up believing that [capitalists] were making the world a better place,” she says. “The capitalism we have has left us with degraded infrastructure, threats to our health, and global warming.”
Most of the 1% prefer not to talk about their good fortune. As the New York Times recently observed in an article on the 1%, “Some envisioned waking up to protesters on the lawn; others feared audits by the IRS or other punitive government action.”
But Mr Perkowitz and Ms Renstrom are utterly typical of the 1% in that they are far more politically engaged than the average 99-percenters. Nearly all the rich people surveyed by Northwestern vote, 68% make campaign contributions, nearly half had contacted a member of Congress and a fifth had solicited contributions on behalf of a candidate. A good chunk of those calls were meant to help their businesses. But many were motivated by the common good, defined in as many different ways as the sources of their wealth.
from the print edition | United States
Recommend
294
Submit to reddit
inShare
116
View all comments (180)
Related items
TOPIC: Business »
Money talks: April 23rd 2012: The enemy of finance?
The world economy: The euro-zone threat
US Airways and American Airlines: US Airways makes a deal with AA’s unions
TOPIC: Economics »
Firewalls: A bigger IMF war chest
Banking in the developing world: The poor are different
The return of the euro crisis: Beyond battlefield medicine
TOPIC: Economic Inequality »
Democracy and markets: More on the extractive/inclusive debate
Inequality and crisis: The usual suspect
Free exchange: Body of evidence
TOPIC: Occupy Wall Street »
Occupy Wall Street and the media: Talking about a revolution
SuperPACs: Super for democracy?
Occupy Wall Street: Conspiracy envy
More related topics:
United States Mitt Romney

About joelsnell99
Who’s Who in all U.S and U.K. Honoraries (Marquis) 450 publications in 80 venues DANA SPIRIT AWARD/2009 Oxford Roundtable St.Catherine’s College Editor of FOCUS, a student Social Science Journal Author Snell Life Cycle Lonliness Curve Professor Emeritus – Kirkwood College Omicron Delta Kappa $1,000,000 in grants Online Editor for Psychology and Education.com Research Fellow – Arlington Institute Fellow International Biographical Association Outstanding Teacher at Kirkwood College Membership in numerous editorial boards or a reviewer of manuscripts Associate Editor – Psychology and Education Fellow American Biographical Association Co-Author of Snell-Green Professor Index Author of Snell Educator Effectiveness Index Contributer to FutureEdition.com Co-Author of Snell-Allen Medical Rank Index Deputy Director, International Biographical Association Fellow in Kennedy Foundation Co-Author of Snell-Allen Subjective Assessment Sex Role Index Honors >>> Positions and Courses Taught >>> jsnell@kirkwood.edu jsnell@socialvibes.net snelljennifer47@hotmail.com http://www.socialvibes.net Kirkwood http://www.dana.edu Research Council, Advisory Board, International Biographical Centre
View all posts by joelsnell99 →
This entry was posted in New Essays and tagged TOP 1%. Bookmark the permalink.
← CROWDED PRISONS
APARTMENT THERAPY →

Professor
Joel Snell
HEADLINES
TRUMP HINTS THAT HE WANTS TO BE A DICTATOR LIKE IN NORTH KOREA
HOW BANKS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES SCREW YOU?
HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO MAKE A MOVIE?
TRUSTEES CALL FOR ENGLER TO STEP DOWN.
HEADLINE NEWS
socialvibes RSS
HEADLINE NEWS
MSNBC
Categories
New Essays
Academia
2003 Posts
2004 Posts
2006 Posts
2007 Posts
2008 Posts
2009 Posts
2010 Posts
2011 Posts
2012 Posts
2013 Posts
Bio
Book Reviews
CNN News
An objective and sober assessment could help America move on from a bitter election. Here’s why it won’t.
Trump: The IG report ‘exonerates me’
Trump pounces on Justice Department report findings
Reporter confronts Trump on Cohen
Trump: I did a great job with N. Korea
Nashville Recording Artist Reuben Brock

www.reubenbrock.com

More Visitors every month!
Serving USA * UK * Scandinavia * Europe
2,500,000. HITS
1,00,000 Visitors
New Essays Every week!
VISITORS AND HITS
STATS FROM
URCHIN CORPORATION/
SOCIALVIBES.NET
IS NOW IN IT’S
NINETH YEAR/
ADVERTISEMENTS
FROM GOOGLE
New music from
Nashville singer/songwriter Reuben Brock.
SOCIALVIBES.NET

Share this: