|
PROZAC VERSUS PLACEBO: AN
EDITORIAL Introduction: In May of 2002, the general public
was introduced to the following: the use of Prozac compared with a placebo made
no difference with two groups of depressed patients. At least that was the
headline. We suggest that the popular print literature is filled with
relatively similar interpretations of the study with minor deviations in
detail. Thus, the general impression for the ordinary reader is that one should
not bother with anti-depressants because they don’t work. Further, in the back
of their minds, readers may be thinking about other related issues such as the
huge cost of prescriptions in general and the dubious nature of psychiatric
procedures and related topics (Snell et. al 1989.) We want to suggest another
alternative. Review: The study that generated headlines
was “The functional Neuroanatomy of the Placebo Effect” AMERICAN JOURNAL OF
PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 159, 728-737. It was authored by Mayberg et. al. To the
credit of the authors/researchers, this is one of the first studies that used a
PET scan. They discovered that both groups (prozac vs. placebo) had "Similar" changes in cortical
(thinking) and limbic-Para limbic (emotional) regions. Additionally, the talent of the
authors, the prestige of the journal, and the esteem generally given to the
university of the research scholars increased credibility of the study. Criticism: We want to place our criticism at
the press rather than the research. The media simplified and over generalized
the findings in the study. We want to indicate why we take this position. First, the study deals with 17
unipolar depressed males who were hospitalized. We want to emphasize that 17
patients do not warrant inferences to general or depressed populations. Second, they were given either the
placebo or Prozac for six weeks. That is too short of a time for some patients
to respond to the medication. Third, they were only given
Prozac. The general impression in the medical field and from the expertise of
the second author (M.M.) is that a number of different anti-depressants are
used until there is one that the patient identifies as efficacious. Fourth, all the patients
experienced other variables that were conducive to depression reduction
including rest, hospitalization, support from medical staff. Fifth, the senior author of the
study indicated that the placebo effect on the patients had a short-term effect
and that the entire group was put on Prozac after 6 weeks. Sixth, the authors mentioned that
placebos do not work as well as antidepressants in previous studies as
indicated in the rather extensive review of the literature. Seventh, we cannot imagine that a
psychiatrist in a legal setting would be able to say that s/he is not liable if
they had not used an anti-depressant because it is just like a placebo and thus
they are not lawfully accountable for the suicide of a patient. Eighth, we cannot emphasize how
much damage the general press headline has done to the patient and the
psychiatric community, when numerous important details and caveats were
omitted. Ninth, we are not here to defend
antidepressant therapy as a singular experience. Rather, antidepressant should
be given in the context of some form of psychotherapy, particularly a therapy
that provides life skills to a patient. We disagree with the “third wave”
psychiatrists that the medication alone can heal the patient (Snell et. al.
1989, Snell 1994, Snell, Marsh, 1995, Snell, Marsh, Wakefield, 1995.) Tenth, this rejoinder is meant to
defend psychotropic medications when they are properly used and under the care
of a psychiatrist and supporting psychotherapist. This is not a defense of
pharmaceutical companies. Conclusion: The authors believe that the media
simplified and over generalized the findings of a small sample of patients, who
took medications for a short period, did not take into account the placebo
effect of the hospital setting seriously, nor rotate numerous anti-depressants,
or take into effect the placebo implications of a hospital setting. In the end,
all the patients took the antidepressants and the authors were the first to
mention numerous other studies that indicated that the placebo has a short
duration in terms of relapse. Other implications were also mentioned. References Cited: Snell, Joel (1989) “A Note on
Educational Management and Third Revolution Lithium Regime, A Reassessment and
Commentary” PSYCHOLOGY: A JOURNAL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR, V. 26, #213, and p. 65-69. Snell, Joel (1994) “A Prozac
Future? May but Human Touch Figures Large” CEDAR RAPIDS GAZETTE, July 31, p. 4.
Snell, Joel and Mitchell Marsh
(1995) “The Efficacy of Psychotropic Medications for Treatment and Management
of Incarcerated Offenders” ACADEMY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SCIENCES, Panel 198,
March 7-11. Snell, Joel; Marsh Mitchell and
Bill Wakefield (1995) The Viability of Psychotropic Medications for
Incarcerated Offender Populations” MIDWEST CRIMINAL JUSTICE ASSOCIATION, Panel
3, October 4-6. |
| Home | Essays | Small Talk | Books | About Joel Snell | Publications | Links |