FUTURISM IN ACADEMIA: A DISCUSSION AND APPLICATION Introduction In the mid 60’s, THE FUTURIST began publication. Both THE FUTURIST and the World Future Society were created to encourage numerous parties including private and public institutions to start thinking about the future. Most individuals involved in this enterprise cautioned the public that at times THE FUTURIST would publish “forecasts” but not predictions as that second word connoted a degree of accuracy not obtainable by most or all human beings (Cornish, Edward, 1997.) Over the years, numerous strategies have been used to make prognostications about future events and emerging behavior and institutions. (Snell, Joel & R. Gary Dean, 1975.) Accuracy Recently, THE FUTURIST has evaluated the accuracy of the first forecast made in 1967. Edward Cornish the author of the article, and the president of the World Future Society noted in that early inaugural issue that 68% of the forecasts were correct. He viewed this in the negative. (Cornish, Edward 1997.) The authors disagree. If this level of accuracy was obtainable in sports (Young, 1997) business or academia, it would be considered a success (Donnelly, David 1997.) There is considerable literature about technical stock forecasts and 70% accuracy is thought to be short of excellent (Phillips, Howard, 1997.) Recently, a stock forecaster who able to predict market flow with over a 70% accuracy was given unusual coverage in BUSINESS WEEK (1997:132-133.) On the other hand, psychics when analyzed for accuracy from 1979 to the end of 1997, had less than a 1% accuracy rate (CNN, 1998.) It is unclear, how accurate science fiction writers have been (Clarke, 1991, Brunner, 1993.) It is hard to mathematically to assess what chance would be with a 68% accuracy, however, using a 2x 2 table, for chi square, 68% is 4.75 for chance. It is significant at the .05 level. Using the " Cornish criteria", the authors analyzed another article published in 1974 making forecasts about 1994. In a US NEWS & WORLD REPORT article entitled “What Life Will Be Like 20 Years In The Future” ( 1974:72-75.)both authors analyzed the accuracy of the forecast and we found roughly a 70% accuracy rate. Once again, this is quite good by comparing this with other standards. Application If this level of accuracy remains in further studies, we would suggest that futurism become part of mainstream academia. There are some possible applications and they are the following: 1. Although futurism, futurology, future studies is now advertised by a few schools in the THE FUTURIST, it is quite possible that futurism could not necessarily become a major, but could be incorporated in the curriculum. One of the authors’ text book has a future section at the end of each chapter (Sullivan, 1997.) 2. For less than $2,000.00, the entire microfiche of THE FUTURIST can be purchased and numerous studies can be done relative to the accuracy of futurists. Not only accuracy can be nominally measured, but numerous multiple regression analysis (forward solution and step wise) in terms of which futurist or which topics where the futurists are most accurate could be conducted.* 3. Environmental scanning has become part of the academic
enterprise. One of the possible future trends become known to not only the futurist, but also to important constituents who may have to make knowledgeable decisions about the life and death of their institutions that they administer.** There is now a community college consortium that deals with issues that impact on community colleges. It is called TRENDLINK and is thought to be excellent.(Friedel, J.N. 1994.) 4. A futurist course could become part of the curriculum. As in criminal justice studies and a number of other applied areas, a futurist courses or courses, would be multidisciplinary.(Siegal, 1989:6.) 5. Futurism could become so acceptable, that most schools would have a major in the area. The curriculum would include not only the theories, disciplines complimenting the field, but also the methodology used to forecast. Conclusion Futurism has the potential to make numerous contributions to academia. References cited ___________, “What Life Will Be Like 20 Years In The Future: US NEWS & WORLD REPORT, January 14, 1974, 72-75. ___________, “Psychics strike out, again, on 1997 predictions” CNN interactive News, January 1, 1998. (quick news index) Brunner, John “Sometime in the recent Future” NEW SCIENTIST, April 10, 1993, p.28. Clarke, I.F. “Factor three: Science and Fiction” FUTURES, July-August 1991, p. 637. Cornish, Edward, “The Futurist Forecasts 30 Years Later” THE FUTURIST, January-February, 1997 45-48. Also see, Davidson, Keay “Futurists Flocking to Frisco” (San Francisco Examiner) SIOUX CITY JOURNAL, Friday, July 18, 1997, B-10. Donnelly, David, “Forecasting Assessment Literature” (internet: bentley.uh/co) April 29, 1997, 1-3. See also, Moss, Scott “Computability, Forecasting and Fortune Telling” (internet: weatherhead.cwru.com) April 29, 1997. and Haines,
Kathryn “Financial Engineer Hits With Fund, Stock Forecasts”(internet
www.duke.edu.) April 29, 1997.1-2 and Smart, Charles “Forecasting: Criticizing the Criticism” (internt: www.byte.com/art)1. Edminson, Gail "Good Eye, Mr. Chips: Dauvin of SGS is uncanny at calling industry swings” BUSINESS WEEK, September 8, 1997, 132-133. Friedel,J.N., TRENDLINK, (Cedar Rapids,Iowa: Kirkwood Press) January 1994, 1-11. Phillips, Howard “What is Forecasting Accuracy?”(internet:www.duke.edu) April 29, 1997 1-3. Price Forecasts Siegal, Larry CRIMINOLOGY (St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing) 1989:6. Snell, Joel and R. Gary Dean TO THE YEAR 2020: THE DANA REPORT(Omaha: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) 1975. Sullivan, Thomas J. INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL PROBLEMS (Needham Heights:Ma: Allyn &Bacon) 1997. Young, Mark C., THE GUINESS BOOK OF RECORDS (New York: Guiness Media, Inc.) 1997, p. 212 *Special thanks
to Ms. Jill Miller, former Director of
Library Resources, Kirkwood Community College. Additionally, a sincere thanks
to Mr. Gary Botos for his research for this article. ** Special
Appreciation to Mr. John L. Petersen, President of the Arlington Institute, Arlington, Virginia.
My thanks to Dr.Norm Nielsen, Dr. Terry
Moran, and Prof./Dean Dan Tesar. |
| Home | Essays | Small Talk | Books | About Joel Snell | Publications | Links |