|
Alcohol Consumption and
Social Correlates: Micro Case Analysis Introduction The
use of alcohol has mixed reviews(
Sullivan, 1997) It is a legal
psychoactive drug that any adult can purchase without a prescription. About 5%
of the population are considered heavy drinkers (Sullivan:359.) Thus, there are
many in the country who do not abuse alcohol, nor is it a problem for them. On
the other hand, accidents, crime, family , work , and health problems are linked, but not directly causal to
alcohol.(Sullivan:358.) Review of the Literature There
is extensive data as well as anecdotal information relative to alcohol
consumption. Selected references are listed at the end of this article. Methodology Data
was gathered by the census bureau and was operationalized by micro case data.
The sample was (as best represented by the census bureau) of the entire adult
population of the United States. Alcohol consumption was defined as at least 1 drink or more per day for the
individual consumer. This activity was then correlated with the following
census terms: PLAYBOY(household had subscription to soft pornographic print
magazine) MALE HOMES (single or unattached males sharing household) COUPLES(two
individuals with or without progeny who
cohabit) MARRIAGE (two heterosexuals with legal ties, with or without
children) DIVORCE(individuals previously married.) Correlational
analysis and significance testing was utilized. Hypothesis There
is a significant relationship between
alcohol consumption and the consumption of soft pornography/ being male/cohabiting/marriage/divorce. Findings Playboy Male Homes
Couples Marriage Divorce Alcohol 0.622* 0 .744*
-0.359* 0.560* 0.445* * means significant at the
.01 level Interpretation It
would appear that there is a positive relationship between alcohol and the
subscription to PLAYBOY, male homes, marriage, and divorce. However, there is a
negative correlation between alcohol and couples. Alcohol, stereotypically**,
is strongly related to soft pornography and males. It is mildly correlated to
marriage and divorce. However, there
appears not to be related to couples or cohabiting couples. This finding may be
spurious or invalid. However, more
research in terms of data analysis and multicollenearity may suggest
this finding not to be salient. Further, the operationalization of alcohol must
be improved and more focused. A multiple correlational analysis (stepwise) may
reduce the spurious findings as indicated above. Conclusion It
would appear that alcohol consumption is related to soft pornography, males,
and mildy related to marriage and divorce. Paradoxically, it is not related to
cohabiters, who are stereotypically thought to be less conservative in terms of
life style than married individuals and
thus thought to be those more likely to consume alcohol.*** Further
research and improved operationalization is suggested. Selected References Gusfield,
Joseph Symbolic Crusade:Status Politics
and the American Temperance Movement
(Urbana:University of Illinois Press)1963. Helmer,
John Drugs and Minority Oppression (New York: Seabury Press) 1975 Sullivan
, Thomas Introduction to Social Problems
(Boston: Allyn and Bacon) 1997 Weldon
L. Witters, Peter J. Venturelli, and Glen R. Hanson, Drugs and Society (Boston:
Jones and Bartlett) 1992. Franklin
E. Zimmiring and Gordon Hawkins The
Search for Rational Drug Use (Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Cambridge University) 1992. **Unfortunately,
the stereotype has some data to support this statement. In Sullivan (ibid.361)
males are are more likely to become alcoholics. They are also more likely to
consume visual pornography (Sullivan, 422-423.) ***Again,
a caveat is needed. Cohabiters can include indivuals of diverse demographics. Alcohol
consumption is a sin with some religious groups as is cohabitation. Thus, the
findings indicated above do not support that premise. |
| Home | Essays | Small Talk | Books | About Joel Snell | Publications | Links |